Trump's arrogance
He's setting himself up here as God.
6:48
He's setting himself that I have the power of life and death. I will decide whether Iran is deserving of complete
6:56
destruction or whether they're going to have this wonderful future that I will allow in my graciousness.
7:05
I promise you that's the way it came across to most everybody in that room.
7:09
And how would it not? When when you sit there and you set yourself up above the rule of law, above the US Constitution,
7:18
above any kind of morality, above the even the UN Security Council, above everything and everybody, individual countries, whatever you name
7:27
it, he alone, not even not even the Congress, not even his cabinet, not even anyone.
7:35
I will decide. I have a big decision, said he, about whether I'm going to destroy Iran. And if he goes down that
7:43
path, then that is as illegal, immoral, and unethical as it can get.
7:52
There is no law on the planet whereby the leader of any country can
7:59
just decide on his own that the civilians and the citizens of another country are deserving of death because he says so.
I think Donald Trump is a bully
16:47
who respects only two kinds of people or nations. One is the powerful and he
16:54
faces in the United States a very powerful Zionist lobby which remains
17:00
committed to the destruction of Iran. And he is enthralled to that lobby to
17:08
donors from that lobby who take their cues their direction uh from the fascist
17:14
government in Israel. And the second kind of person he respects is those who
17:20
can blackmail him and the Israelis apparently have the ability to do that.
17:26
The Epstein files are one of the reasons, several reasons that Mike Johnson, the
17:32
speaker of the house, prematurely adjourned the house until after the
17:38
midterm elections. The other reason was that it looked very much as though Thomas Massiey's introduction of a
17:46
bill of impeachment with eight counts of impeachment against secretary of
17:52
defense self-started secretary of wars was going to pass. But the Epstein
17:58
trials were part of this. So were several other issues. And so you
18:04
can see that the speaker of the house who probably is the least
18:10
independent such person in our history is nonetheless aware of that
18:17
Trump's control of the Republican slight majority in the House and the
18:25
larger majority in the Senate is slipping away. So what will Donald Trump do? What
18:32
does he do when confronted with an an intolerable reality that he chooses to
18:40
deny? There's lots of evidence that he's capable of a vote fast and
18:48
abandoning the threats that he made. But there's also evidence that he will
18:53
carry out the threats. Look at the look at the decapitation of Venezuela,
19:00
the invasion of that. Look at the wars, two wars begun by Trump against
19:06
Iran in partnership with Israel. One last year in June, one this year in
19:12
February 28th. So I can't rule out the possibility. What I will say is I think
19:18
there will be enormous opposition to this from the US military.
19:23
whether it's sufficient to produce a sit-down strike in
19:28
effect passive resistance or mutiny of some sort or stimulated coup d'eta I do not
19:36
know the US military despite Pete Hegseth's efforts to politicize it and
19:43
turn it into an arm of white nationalism, Christian nationalism,
19:50
remains deeply indoctrinated in constitutionalism and dedicated to the notion that
19:59
illegal orders must be resisted. So I don't know what would happen, but I don't think you can
20:07
rule out the possibility that Donald Trump's threats are both sincere
20:14
and intended to be implemented.
the smart thing for the Ukrainians to do
17:29
would be to cut a deal because that deal would not be a great deal. We've said that all along, but that deal would be
17:37
better than continuing the war. And that's exactly what Julia Mandel is saying in this new article that
17:45
she's written. But the problem is that you can't convince Zelensky of that logic. number one because he's so
17:53
heavily invested in the war at this point in time and you can't convince Mark Rute and the other European leaders
18:00
in places like Germany, France and Britain at this point in time. So the war just goes on and the situation as
18:08
Mendele points out just gets worse and worse for Ukraine.
- www.theamericanconservative.com - For Ukrainians, a Bad Peace Beats a Worsening War
- www.youtube.com @JohnMearsheimer
you go back to 1914. You go back to 1940 and say, was it in anybody's interest? Why did we put that embargo on Japan?
All of this is warp and woof of the same kind of fabric that the last 150 years have produced periodically with dramatic
dramatic recurrence. And we're about at that point again, I think. Is it that the human race has to kill itself in
massive numbers periodically and some insane power has to lead the way? We are marching down a road that's leading us
to regional and then possibly global conflict. And we're going to produce the depression in the process that will fuel
everyone wanting to participate in it if for no other reason than to discharge their debt which is in colossal proportions right now both private
commercial and war is the best tool for getting rid of that debt or at least shifting it.
at that moment
8:00
foreign secretary Lee Truss and she told him that Britain's aim was for the war continue for as long as possible to
8:08
bleed out the Russians
the role of Radosław (Radek) Sikorski, the Polish foreign minister then, at an early point then the gap and once again now he
25:49
was the one for example who insisted along with Carl Bildt on the insertion of art article 42.7
25:56
in Lisbon treaty, which is an equivalent sort of soft equivalent of NATO's article 5, which in other words;
26:04
It transformed the European Union from a purely economic societal regulatory body
26:11
into a quasi military alliance
[. . .]
the historical demons have been
28:12
unleashed and there's no force in the European elite which are willing to tame them. The only force who's trying to
28:20
calm them down a little bit paradoxically is a certain Donald J.
28:24
Trump, but who you know has a occasional moments of remarkable
28:31
acuity and understands uh what's going on.
[. . .]
after the end of the cold war we should have moved to a post American Europe not anti-American by any means we should have worked with
58:00
the United States United States should have focused on its own national interests we then build a new commonwealth of community from Lisbon to
58:08
Vladivosto we failed brilliant a brilliant idea I would enthusiastically support because it's not anti- anyone. It's just a
58:16
recognition of new realities in the aftermath of the Cold War and it's time for a new and better and stronger future.
Related
Articles:
Forum post:
